A factual correction is an opportunity to make a record more accurate. It is most useful when a reader can understand both the original problem and the reason for the change. A vague assurance that something has been “updated” may leave the important question unanswered.
On a personal website, the responsibility for a correction belongs to the person publishing the text. I want to approach that responsibility directly. If a factual statement I publish is wrong, the first question should be how to put the information right, rather than how to avoid drawing attention to the mistake.
Identify the exact passage
A correction request becomes easier to assess when it points to a particular sentence, figure or date. A broad disagreement with an article may contain several different issues. Identifying them separately makes it possible to examine each on its own terms.
For example, a request about an incorrect date can identify the date on the page and the record that supports another one. A disagreement with a personal opinion needs a different kind of response. Both may deserve attention, but they do not call for the same editorial action.
Examine what the evidence supports
A document should be read for what it establishes, including its scope and date. It may answer one question without resolving another. Careful wording should reflect those limits instead of making the correction broader than the supporting material allows.
If the available information remains incomplete, the text can explain that. Accuracy sometimes requires a narrower statement rather than a confident replacement. The aim should be to reduce misunderstanding, not to exchange one unsupported certainty for another.
Make a significant change understandable
A useful correction note can be short and specific. It can say which passage changed, what the corrected information is and when the change was made. Where appropriate, it can identify the supporting source so a reader can assess the basis for the revision.
The following practical details help a correction request:
- A link to the publication being discussed.
- The exact wording believed to contain an error.
- A clear explanation of the proposed correction.
- Relevant supporting material, with its date and origin.
- A contact channel for any necessary clarification.
Leave room for a continuing disagreement
Correcting a factual mistake does not require every reader to share the author’s interpretation. Two people can agree on a date or a quotation while disagreeing about its significance. Keeping those questions separate allows a correction to improve the record without pretending to settle the entire discussion.
I want my own website to be capable of that kind of improvement. A record becomes more useful when its author is willing to make it clearer. I should regard an evidenced correction as part of the work of publishing responsibly, rather than as an exception to it.
AI-generated editorial portrait of Evgeniy Zaifert (Евгений Зайферт): in an ivory knit sweater beside a window and open notebook. The clothing and setting are illustrative, not a record of an actual event.
Continue reading
For clarifications or a correction request, please use the contact page.